TThe Environmental Protection Agency on Tuesday proposed limiting the amount of harmful “perpetual chemicals” in drinking water to the lowest levels that tests can detect. The long-awaited protection, according to the agency, will save thousands of lives and prevent serious diseases, including cancer.
The plan marks the first time the EPA has proposed regulating a group of toxic compounds that are widespread, dangerous and expensive to remove from water. PFAS or per- and polyfluorinated substances do not degrade in the environment and are associated with a wide range of health problems, including low birth weight children and kidney cancer. The agency reports that drinking water is an important source of human exposure to PFAS.
“It is clear to science that long-term exposure to PFAS is associated with significant health risks,” Radhika Fox, EPA Assistant Administrator for Water, said in an interview.
Fox called the federal proposal for “transformational change” to improve the safety of drinking water in the United States. The agency estimates that this rule could reduce nearly 100 million Americans’ exposure to PFAS, reducing rates of cancer, heart attacks, and birth complications.
Chemicals have been used since the 1940s in consumer products and industry, including in non-stick pans, food packaging, and firefighting foam. Currently, their use in the US has mostly been phased out, but some still remain.
The proposal would set strict limits of 4 parts per trillion, the lowest level that can be measured reliably, for two common types of PFAS compounds called PFOA and PFOS. In addition, the EPA wants to regulate the total number of four other types of PFAS. Water providers will have to keep an eye on PFAS.
The public will have an opportunity to comment and the agency may make changes before publishing the final rule, which is expected by the end of the year. Water providers will have time to adjust.
Environmental and public health advocates have been calling for federal regulation of PFAS chemicals for years. Over the past decade, the Environmental Protection Agency has repeatedly tightened its protective, voluntary health thresholds for chemicals, but has not imposed mandatory limits on water suppliers.
Public concern has risen in recent years as tests reveal PFAS chemicals in a growing list of communities that are often near manufacturing plants or air force bases.
So far, only a few states have issued PFAS regulations, and none of them have set limits as strict as the EPA suggests. By regulating PFOA and PFOS at the lowest levels that tests can detect, the EPA is proposing the most stringent standards that are technically feasible, experts say.
“This is a truly historic moment,” said Melanie Benes, vice president of government relations for the Environment Working Group. “There are many communities that have had PFAS in their water for decades and have been waiting a long time for this announcement to come out.”
The agency said its proposal would protect everyone, including vulnerable communities, and reduce the incidence on a massive scale. The EPA wants water providers to test, notify the public when PFAS are found, and remove compounds when levels are too high.
Highly polluting utilities are usually given time to fix problems, but can be fined or forfeited federal subsidies if the problems persist.
The proposal would also regulate other types of PFAS, such as GenX Chemicals, which manufacturers used as a substitute when PFOA and PFOS were phased out of consumer products. The proposal would regulate the cumulative health threat from these compounds and prescribe treatment if that threat is too high.
The EPA recently gave states $2 billion to get rid of pollutants like PFAS and will provide billions more in the coming years. The agency is also providing technical support to small communities that will soon be forced to install treatment systems, and the 2021 Infrastructure Act provides funding for water system upgrades.
But it will still be expensive for public utilities to install new equipment, and the burden will be especially heavy for small cities with fewer resources.
“This issue has been passed on to the utilities through no fault of theirs,” said Shri Vedachalam, director of water equity and climate resilience at Environmental Consulting & Technology Inc.
Vedachalam said many communities will need to balance the new PFAS requirements with the removal of poisonous lead pipes and the replacement of old water pipes that are prone to bursting.
Fox said there is “no single answer” to how communities will prioritize their needs. However, she said that federal resources are allocating billions of dollars to improve water quality.
Several states have already introduced restrictions on the content of PFAS in drinking water. Officials in Michigan, which has the strictest standards of any state, said the costs of removing PFAS in communities where it was found were reasonable.
If the rules are finalized and implemented, many communities will find out that they supplied drinking water with harmful compounds. When people become aware of the problems, they may stop using tap water altogether, compromising its safety, and switch to bottled water instead. It is often a more expensive choice that can have negative health effects if people replace tap water with sugary drinks that cause cavities and contribute to obesity and other health problems.
“That,” Fox said, “is very disturbing to people.”
______
The Phillies reported from St. Louis.
The Associated Press receives support from the Walton Family Foundation to cover water and environmental policy. AP is solely responsible for all content.
More must-read content from TIME
connect with us emails@time.com.