Yesterday, I praised Viola Davis’ Oscar speech for being memorable without being overtly political—for simply talking about her work in a touching and well-written way. Twitter quickly let me know that I missed something. On social media and on conservative news sites, Davis’ speech actually sparked outrage.
Explaining that she believed her mission was to “unearth… the stories of people who dreamed great things but never made those dreams come true, people who fell in love and lost,” Davis said:
I became an artist – and thank God I did – because we are the only profession that celebrates what it means to live life.
This statement became one of the points of discussion of the right Internet after the Oscars ceremony. “Art is beautiful; art enriches; art can connect us to each other,” writes Ben Shapiro. V daily wire. “But the sheer arrogance of declaring that artists are “the only profession that celebrates what it means to live life” is simply amazing. How about doctors? What about stay-at-home mothers who help shape lives rather than pursue their own career interests? How about undertakers? How about if almost everyone in a free market economy gives themselves to others to improve life?
Variations of this sentiment have ricocheted online, with Davis sometimes being misquoted as saying that only “actors” celebrate what it means to live life, or worse, are the only ones who “know” what it means to live life. .
Do people have the right to be offended? Did they say that artists are better than everyone else? If you read her words literally, in the context of her speech, and give her the slightest benefit of doubt, it’s hard to see the backlash against Davis as anything but a symptom of our overblown culture wars.
Everyone “celebrates what it means to live life” in their own way, but for whom can this be the main function of their profession? Artists, definitely. The clergy, perhaps. Doctors Keep life, not to glorify them, and it does not humiliate them if they talk about it. Stay home parents help others, and Davis might even agree that it is more noble, important and necessary than “glorifying” the meaning of life.
Her point was simply that artists have a unique role to play in telling stories about the human experience and that she is glad to be a part of that.
Of course, she could have edited herself to be less controversial, though perhaps less interesting., statements. If she had simply said, “I became an artist—and thank God I did—because we are celebrating what it means to live life,” the complaints might have been more difficult. The word “one” emphasizes the special feature of the artists, but it is also a whistle for anyone who has a strong resentment of Hollywood elitism and condescension. And there has rarely been a better time to express such outrage than now.
On the right, reflective aversion to the entertainment industry has taken on a new dimension under Donald Trump. during Fox and friends after Oscarthe confusion that la la country Wrongly declared “Best Picture” Steve Doucey called “Hollywood got the election wrong, and last night Hollywood got the Oscar wrong.” Guest Tucker Carlson agreed, but added that Moonlight “should have won” because that’s what the moralizing, politically correct establishment wanted. Yes, the Oscars were both a disaster out of touch with reality and a cunningly rigged game.
Donald Trump interpreted the Academy’s failure in his own way: “I think they were so focused on politics that at the end they couldn’t come together,” he said. beardas if the accountant of PricewaterhouseCoopers, who handed Warren Beatty the wrong envelope did so because he cursed too hard at Kimmel, who tweeted the president “are you okay?”
Liberals may moan when Trump attributes a logistical error to his critics. But of course, both sides today see a lot of politics in entertainment: see below. all takes do like Dusi and compare the end of the Oscars to election night.
To many viewers on Sunday, Davis’s speech was remarkable in that she almost went beyond the partisan strife and just spoke passionately about acting. But one word – “only” – was enough to make it a culture war litmus test. Maybe she wanted to argue about the place of art in society, or maybe she just portrayed her profession as she really sees it. In any case, it was a defiant move in an age where artists are increasingly being held to the same standards as candidates for office: they are expected to choose their words not for truth, but for politics.
Northern Mexico is so addicted to exotic animals and violence that people not only keep tigers as pets, but also steal them.
On Tuesday, prosecutors in the brutal northern state of Sonora said they were looking for an adult Bengal tiger named Baluma. They said the 5-year-old tiger was stolen on Monday from a home in the state capital Hermosillo.
Prosecutors released photos of a large cat resting in a cage next to a dog, in the hope that residents would call the police if they saw the tiger.
🟤 Official, la #FiscaliaDeSonora inició Investigación por el delito de robo de un tigre de Bengala en la col. Nueva Esperanza, #Hermosillo; según lo expuesto por la propietaria en redes sociales, fue sustraído el pasado 27 de marso de donde estaba resguardado. 1/3 pic.twitter.com/mXb3WFKK9z
Authorities said the owners had the proper paperwork needed to keep the animal.
There have long been problems in Mexico with people keeping and sometimes losing control of big cats, which can sometimes be found in the homes of drug dealers and can sometimes be seen roaming free.
Mexican drug dealers have long been addicted to exotic animals.
Spider last year Monkey dressed as drug gang mascot found shot to death after the shootout. Photos from the scene skirmish in Tehcaltitlan with the police, in which 11 members of a drug gang were killed, showed little monkey – dressed in a tiny camouflage jacket and a tiny “bulletproof” vest – stretched out on the body of a dead militant, who, apparently, was his owner.
Also last year, a 450-pound tiger roamed the streets of the Pacific coast state of Nayarit, and a man died of mauling while trying to pet a captured tiger in a cartel-controlled area in the western state of Michoacán.
Thanks for reading CBS NEWS.
Create your free account or log in for more features.
An Australian company on Tuesday removed the glass cap from a meatball made from lab-grown, cultured meat using the genetic sequence of a long-extinct pachyderm, saying it was meant to spark public debate about the high-tech delicacy.
The launch at the Amsterdam Science Museum took place just a few days before April 1st, so there was an elephant in the room: is that true?
“This is not an April Fool’s joke,” said Tim Noaksmith, founder of Australian startup Vow. “This is real innovation.”
Cultured meat, also called cultured or cell meat, is made from animal cells. Its production does not require the slaughter of livestock, which advocates say is better not only for the animals but also for the environment.
Vow used the mammoth’s publicly available genetic information, filled in the missing pieces with the genetic data of its closest living relative, the African elephant, and placed them in a sheep’s cage, Noaksmith said. Under the right conditions in the lab, the cells multiplied until there were enough of them to roll into meatballs.
More than 100 companies around the world are working on cultured meat products, many of them start-ups like Vow.
Experts say that if the technology is widely adopted, it could significantly reduce the environmental impact of global meat production in the future. Currently, billions of acres of land are used for agriculture around the world.
But don’t expect it to be on plates all over the world anytime soon. At the moment, tiny Singapore is the only country that has allowed the consumption of cell-based meat. Vow hopes to sell its first product there, farmed Japanese quail meat, later this year.
The mammoth meatball is a one-of-a-kind item that has not even been tried by its creators and is not planned to be commercially produced. Instead, it was presented as a source of protein that would make people talk about the future of meat.
“We wanted people to be excited that the future of food will be different from what we had before. That there are things that are unique and better than the meat we definitely eat now, and we thought the mammoth would be a conversation starter and get people excited about this new future,” Noakesmith told The Associated Press.
“The woolly mammoth has also traditionally been a symbol of loss. We now know that he died from climate change. And so we wanted to see if we could create something that would symbolize a more exciting future that would be better not only for us, but for the planet,” he added.
An artist’s depiction of a woolly mammoth roaming the earth during the early ice age.Getty Images
Seren Kell, manager of science and technology at the Good Food Institute, a non-profit organization that promotes plant-based and cellular alternatives to animal products, said he hopes the project will “open up new conversations about the extraordinary potential of cultured meat to produce more sustainable food.” reduce the climate impact of our current food system and free up land for less intensive farming.”
He said the giant project, with its unconventional source of genes, was an exception in the new meat farming sector, which usually focuses on traditional livestock production of cattle, pigs and poultry.
“By growing beef, pork, chicken and seafood, we can make the biggest impact in terms of reducing emissions from traditional livestock production and meeting the growing global demand for meat while meeting our climate goals,” he said.
The huge meatball on display in Amsterdam, somewhere between the size of a softball and a volleyball, was for display purposes only and was frosted to ensure it wouldn’t get damaged on the way out of Sydney.
But when it was cooked – first slowly baked, and then processed on the outside with a blowtorch – it smelled nice.
“People who were there said that the fragrance was somewhat similar to another prototype we had made before, which was crocodile,” Noakesmit said. “So it’s very exciting to think that the addition of protein from an animal that’s been extinct for 4,000 years has given it a completely unique and new flavor that we as a population haven’t experienced in a very long time.”
